Connect with us
blank

BSM Writers

Covid-19 Has Closed Atlantic City, But It Can’t Beat Mike Gill

“I just had Sal Paolantonio on Friday, he’s from the area and said if they don’t open the Jersey Shore for the summer it would be like the impact of having like five hurricanes rip through here.”

Tyler McComas

Published

on

blank

Not being able to talk about live sports is one thing, but throw in the inability to talk about gambling and it’s a whole other element. As casinos across the country remain closed, that means sports gambling has essentially come to a complete halt after gaining a ton of traction over the past year. 

In Atlantic City, casinos have been closed since March 16th. Over the course of a month, that equals to around 500 million dollars in lost revenue. Factor that in with the entire Jersey Shore being shut down and it’s easy to see how the local economy in South Jersey has been hit hard. 

Slots turn off, tables go dark. Inside Atlantic City when all ...

Mike Gill, program director and host at 97.3 ESPN in Atlantic City, is seeing the effects that closed casinos is having on the area. Most notably, with the absence of sports gambling for content. 

“Yeah, that’s been an interesting challenge,” said Gill. “We really started to add sports gambling content during the football season and that’s been almost completely stripped away. I mean we still try to throw out these segments, where, we’re looking at futures and tying it into the Eagles, which is the local team here, but it has essentially become a non-entity for us for the time being.

“But we’re trying to get creative with different future bets and some fun things. Look, at this point we’re trying to have as much fun as possible while the format sheet is out the window. If you can find something to entertain, we’re all about it. They have betting odds on, and I haven’t seen the Tiger King, but they have future odds on that show as well as others. We are utilizing it as much as we can but it’s certainly not where it was when it got legalized at first.”

When you’ve tried to establish gambling content on your local programming and it’s suddenly taken away, that can be a big adjustment. So, as both a PD and a host, you have to trust your instincts during a time like this on what’s still going to hit. Granted, with the NFL being the main show in town, things have been easier for Atlantic City than for non-football markets, but finding the perfect balance over the past month has been a day-to-day grind for most hosts. 

“I’m trying to find a balance of not going so far off the reservation, in terms of talking about sports, but we’ve just been trying to have fun,” said Gill. “Last week we did a segment where my producer had all the NBA Jam rosters from like 1994. I had to try and guess the two players that were on the NBA Jam rosters for each team. So we had fun with that and had the NBA Jam music playing in the background. 

“We had the 76ers Process quiz where I had all the players that played for the Sixers during The Process years and I will give you clues and listeners had to text in who I was talking about before my producer got it right. We’re just trying to be creative and have fun but we find people like the nostalgia of hearing the names of guys that played in the 90s. Again, we want to have fun but we don’t want to get into crazy political stuff in this time.”

Mike Gill > 97.3 ESPN ? Page 15

Two weeks ago, Jay Recher shared how 95.3 WDAE in Tampa Bay is openly trying to promote business in the area that are open. It’s a good deed for the community and has grown in popularity. It’s cool to see so many stations use their platform to help other local businesses during this time of need. And don’t be surprised to see good deeds being paid back to the stations that helped after the economy picks back up. 

97.3 ESPN is doing their own variation of showing their support to the public by recognizing those who are on the front lines of the pandemic. It’s a small gesture but still goes a long way in the community.

“I’m doing something, where I ask, once an hour, for listeners to text the name and a photo of somebody who’s a first responder, grocery store worker, on the police force or firefighters and we put their name and picture up on the website. Once an hour we read off all the names and recognize the people who are still working during this time.”

Normally during this time, the Jersey Shore is prepping for another busy summer. It’s how many local businesses in the area stay afloat for the entire year and make their living. But with everything except non-essential businesses being shut down across the country, billions of dollars could be lost if things in South Jersey are still closed during the summer. This, obviously, would kill local businesses and would have a direct effect on Gill’s station. 

“It hasn’t hit us yet, because the peak season has gotten a little later here than it used to be,” Gill said. “It’s usually around the Fourth of July where our tourism season really kind of kicks off now. That’s when the schools are out in Philadelphia when everybody comes down here. If that happens, and I just had Sal Paolantonio on Friday, he’s from the area and said if they don’t open the Jersey Shore for the summer it would be like the impact of having like five hurricanes rip through here.”

Now it just got really serious. Is that an overreaction? I’d actually tend to trust Paolantonio’s opinion on this, seeing as it’s a multi-billion dollar industry. But that paints a picture to just how bad the economic impact of Covid-19 can be on Atlantic City. And by now you know, the more local businesses are hurt, the more sports radio stations are hurt, too. 

March Sadness In Atlantic City: A Walk On The Boardwalk After Shutdown

God willing, football is going to happen and everything will be just fine. Let’s start believing that. But every station owner and PD is at least trying to project what things would look like for their respective station if football doesn’t happen. When you’re the South Jersey affiliate for the Eagles, everything seemingly rides on a successful fall season. 

“It’s probably our station’s biggest sellable time,” Gill said of football season. “At this point, I’m kind of in the camp where, if it gets off the ground on time, I don’t see how they have people in the building. Are you going to have some sort of configuration of people sitting in every third seat from each other? I don’t think people are going to feel safe going right back to 60,000 and 70,000 seat stadiums. I don’t see that happening on time. The other problem is I don’t see the training camps getting started on time. I don’t know if that matters to them, they had a lockout in 2011, and they seemed to not need all that stuff but I would be pretty shocked if opening weekend had full stadiums.”

BSM Writers

Who Handled the Tua Concussion Discussion Best?

Rex Ryan, Rodney Harrison, and Boomer Esiason stood out with their commentary on the Tagovailoa story.

Avatar photo

Published

on

blank

The major story going into the bulk of Week 4’s NFL action on Sunday was the concussion suffered by Miami Dolphins quarterback Tua Tagovailoa in Thursday’s game versus the Cincinnati Bengals.

Amazon’s Thursday Night Football telecast, particularly its halftime show, faced heavy criticism for neglecting to mention that Tagovailoa had been tested for a concussion in his previous game just four days earlier. Additionally, the NFL Players Association called for an investigation into whether or not the league’s concussion protocols were followed properly in evaluating Tagovailoa.

In light of that, how would the Sunday NFL pregame shows address the Tagovailoa concussion situation? Would they better inform viewers by covering the full story, including the Week 3 controversy over whether or not proper protocols were followed?

We watched each of the four prominent pregame shows — ESPN’s Sunday NFL Countdown, Fox NFL Sunday, CBS’s The NFL Today, and NBC’s Football Night in America — to compare how the Tagovailoa story was covered. With the benefit of two extra days to research and report, did the Sunday shows do a better job of informing and engaging viewers?

Here’s how the pregame studio crews performed with what could be the most important NFL story of the year:

Sunday NFL Countdown – ESPN

ESPN’s pregame show is the first to hit the air each Sunday, broadcasting at 10 a.m. ET. So the Sunday NFL Countdown crew had the opportunity to lead the conversation for the day. With a longer, three-hour show and more resources to utilize in covering a story like this, ESPN took full advantage of its position.

The show did not lead off with the Tagovailoa story, opting to lay out Sunday’s schedule, which included an early game in London between the Minnesota Vikings and New Orleans Saints. But the Countdown crew eventually got to issue on everyone’s minds approximately 28 minutes into the program.

Insider Adam Schefter provided the latest on the NFL and NFLPA’s investigation into the matter, particularly the “gross motor instability” Tagovailoa displayed in stumbling on the field and how the Dolphins initially announced that the quarterback had suffered a head injury, but later changed his condition to a back injury.

Schefter added that the NFL and NFLPA were expected to interview Tagovailoa and pass new guidelines for concussion protocols, including that no player displaying “gross motor instability” will be allowed to play. Those new rules could go into effect as early as Week 5.

“This is an epic fail by the NFL,” said Matt Hasselbeck to begin the commentary. “This is an epic fail by the medical staff, epic fail by everybody! Let’s learn from it!”

Perhaps the strongest remarks came from Rex Ryan, who said coaches sometimes need to protect players from themselves.

“I had a simple philosophy as a coach: I treated every player like my son,” Ryan said. “Would you put your son back in that game after you saw that?

“Forget this ‘back and ankle’ BS that we heard about! This is clearly from head trauma! That’s it. I know what it looks like. We all know what it looks like.”

Where Sunday NFL Countdown‘s coverage may have stood out the most was by bringing injury analyst Stephania Bell into the discussion. Bell took a wider view of the story, explaining that concussions had to be treated in the long-term and short-term. Science needs to advance; a definitive diagnostic tool for brain injury doesn’t currently exist. Until then, a more conservative approach has to be taken, holding players out of action more often.

Grade: A. Countdown covered the story thoroughly. But to be fair, it had the most time.

The NFL Today – CBS

CBS’s pregame show led off with the Tagovailoa story, going right to insider Jonathan Jones to report. He cited the key phrase “gross motor instability” as a significant indication of a concussion.

Jones also clarified that the unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant who helped evaluate Tagovailoa made “several mistakes” in consulting with the Dolphins’ team doctor, leading to his dismissal by the NFL and NFLPA.

The most pointed remarks came from Boomer Esiason, who said any insinuation that the Dolphins, head coach Mike McDaniel, or the team medical staff put Tagovailoa back in the game in order to win was “off-base.” Phil Simms added that the concussion experts he spoke with indicated that Tagovailoa could miss four to six weeks with this injury.

Grade: B-. The opinions from the analysts were largely bland. Jones’s reporting stood out.

Fox NFL Sunday

The Fox NFL pregame show also led off with the Tagovailoa story, reviewing the questions surrounding how the quarterback was treated in Week 3 before recapping his injury during Week 4’s game.

Jay Glazer reported on the NFL’s investigation, focusing on whether or not Tagovailoa suffered a concussion in Week 3. And if he did, why was he allowed to play in Week 4? Glazer noted that Tagovailoa could seek a second, maybe a third medical opinion on his injury.

Jimmy Johnson provided the most compelling commentary, sharing his perspective from the coaching side of the situation. He pointed out that when an injured player comes off the field, the coach has no contact with him. The medical team provides an update on whether or not the player can return. In Johnson’s view, Mike McDaniel did nothing wrong in his handling of the matter. He has to trust his medical staff.

Grade: B. Each of the analysts shared stronger opinions, particularly in saying a player failing “the eyeball test” with concussion symptoms should be treated seriously.

Football Night in America – NBC

Sunday Night Football was in a different setting than the other pregame shows, with Maria Taylor, Tony Dungy, and Rodney Harrison broadcasting on-site from Tampa Bay. With that, the show led off by covering the aftermath of Hurricane Ian, its effects on the Tampa area, and how the Buccaneers dealt with the situation during the week.

But after 20 minutes, the show got into the Tagovailoa story with Mike Florio reporting what his peers told viewers earlier in the day regarding pending changes to the NFL’s concussion protocol and “gross motor instability” being used as a major indicator.

Florio emphasized that the NFLPA would ask how Tagovailoa was examined and treated. Was he actually examined for a back injury in Week 3? And if he indeed suffered a back injury, why was he still allowed to play?

When the conversation went back to the on-site crew, Dungy admitted that playing Thursday night games always concerned him when he was a coach. He disclosed that teams playing a Thursday game needed to have a bye the previous week so they didn’t have to deal with a quick, four-day turnaround. That scheduling needs to be addressed for player safety.

But Harrison had the most engaging reaction to the story, coming from his experience as a player. He admitted telling doctors that he was fine when suffering concussion symptoms because he wanted to get back in the game. Knowing that was wrong, Harrison pleaded with current players to stay on the sidelines when hurt because “CTE takes you to a dark place.”

“It’s not worth it. Please take care of yourself,” said Harrison. “Don’t depend on the NFL. Don’t depend on anybody. If something’s wrong with your head, report it.”

Grade: B+. Dungy and Harrison’s views of the matter from their perspective as a coach and player were very compelling.

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

Jason Barrett Podcast – Terry Dugan & Adam Delevitt, BetRivers

Jason Barrett

Published

on

blank

Sportsbooks are creating their own media now, and no company is doing that using more guys that have made their names on sports radio than BetRivers. Terry Dugan & Adam Delevitt talk about the strategy behind that decision for today and for the future.

iTunes: https://buff.ly/3nTJC5K 

Spotify: https://buff.ly/3z9hErM

iHeart: https://buff.ly/3oyi0U0

Google: https://buff.ly/3vh7Tqu

Amazon: https://buff.ly/3w9hqAh

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

Joe Rogan Betting Admission Reveals Gray Area

Rogan’s admission raises a question as to just how ethical it is to place bets with insider information, and whether it should be legal or not.

Avatar photo

Published

on

Joe Rogan

For nearly a decade, I’ve been fortunate enough to cover the football and basketball programs for the University of Kentucky in some form or fashion. Whether writing for blogs or working with ESPN Louisville as co-host of the post-game show, I’ve gotten to know people around the program I grew up supporting, and other individuals in the media doing the same. I’ve made some terrific friendships and cultivated quite a few relationships that provide me with “inside information” about the teams.

As an avid sports bettor, that information has sometimes put me into some difficult personal situations. There have been times when I’ve been alerted to player news that wasn’t public, such as a player dealing with an injury or suspension. It’s often been told to me off-the-record, and I’ve never put that information out publicly or given it to others.

I wish I could also say I’ve never placed a wager based on that information, but that would be a lie. While it’s been a long time since I’ve done so, I’ve ventured into that ethical gray area of betting on a team that I’m covering. I’ve long felt uncomfortable doing so, and I’d say it’s been a few years since I last did it.

At least I know I’m not alone. On his latest episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, Rogan told guest Bert Kreischer that earlier in his UFC broadcasting career he regularly bet on fights. He claims to have won nearly 85% of the time (which I highly doubt but that’s another discussion for another time), either via bets he made or ones he gave to a business partner to place on his behalf.

From his comments, Rogan doesn’t seem to have been using sensitive information to gain an edge with the books, but he also didn’t state that he didn’t. He indicates that much of his success stemmed from knowing quite a bit more about fighters coming from overseas, and he said he “knew who they were and I would gamble on them.”

But Rogan undoubtedly has long been in a position where he knows which fighters might be dealing with a slight injury, or who are struggling in camp with a specific fighting style. It’s unavoidable for someone whose job puts him into contact with individuals who tell him things off-the-record and divulge details without perhaps even realizing it.

But let’s say Rogan did get that information, and did use it, and was still doing so today. The fact is…there’s nothing illegal about it, not in the United States at least. While it’s against the rules of some entities — the NFL, for example, has stated they could suspend or ban for life individuals who use inside information or provide it to others — it’s not against any established legal doctrine. Unlike playing the stock market, insider betting is not regulated by any central body or by the government.

However, Rogan’s admission raises a question as to just how ethical it is to place bets with insider information, and whether it should be legal or not. Many of the after-the-fact actions that have been taken in the realm of legalized sports betting in this country, or those being discussed currently (such as advertising limitations), fall in line with changes made in Great Britain following their legalization.

One of their big changes was making it illegal to utilize insider information, with very specific definitions about the “misuse of information” and what steps the Gambling Commission may take. It lays out what information can be used, the punishments that may be levied, and at what point it might venture into criminality.

Sportsbooks do have recourse in some instances to recoup money on insider betting, but not many. If they can prove that a wage was influenced, they can cancel the bet or sue for the money. The most well-known instance is the individual who bet $50,000 at +750 odds that someone would streak on the field during Super Bowl LV –which he did– and then was denied the payout when he bragged about his exploits. But unless someone foolishly tells the books that they’ve taken them with information that the public wasn’t privy to, they have little to no chance of doing anything about it.

There are ramifications to insider betting that raise truly ethical dilemmas. Just like stock trading, information can be immeasurably valuable to those with stakes large enough to change prices. If I’m placing a $20 prop bet with the knowledge that a team’s starting running back might be out for a game, or dealing with an ankle injury, I’m not going to harm anybody else playing that line. But if I give that information to a shark, who places a $20,000 wager on that same line, I’ve now enabled someone to move a line and impact other bettors.

Online sports betting in this country continues to grow, and every day we are reminded that there are still aspects of the space that can feel like the wild west. As individuals in the media, we have to decide personally what our ethical stances are in situations like this. We also have to keep in mind the impact that betting can have on our biases–especially if we’ve bet using inside information. A prime example is Kirk Herbstreit, who won’t even make a pick on College Gameday for games he is going to be doing color commentary for lest he possibly appears biased on the call.

At one end of the spectrum, you have someone like Herbstreit, and on the other end, you have folks like Rogan who, while he no longer does so, was more than happy to not only wager on fights himself but gave the information to others. And in the middle, you have hundreds of people in similar situations, who might lean one way or another or who, like me, may have found themselves on either side of that ethical line.

There is no black or white answer here, nor am I saying there’s necessarily a right or wrong stance for anybody in the sports media industry to take. I would say that each person has to take stock of what they’re comfortable doing, and how they feel about insider information being used. Rogan didn’t break any rules or laws by gambling on the UFC, but his admission to doing so might be the catalyst towards it no longer being accepted.

Continue Reading
Advertisement blank
Advertisement blank

Barrett Media Writers

Copyright © 2022 Barrett Media.