Sports Radio News
Firing Ken Rosenthal Is Another Reason For Fans Not To Trust Rob Manfred
“Nobody said these jobs were supposed to be easy. You aren’t going to please everyone, but why make matters worse?”

Published
1 year agoon
By
Andy Masur
Some people just can’t take the heat and instead turn to throwing people out of the kitchen. They aren’t capable of rolling with the punches, even when the criticism coming their way is warranted and documented.
In the case of Rob Manfred v. Ken Rosenthal, the Commissioner of Major League Baseball acted rashly in the face of a not-so vicious attack. Instead of just turning the other cheek, or looking in the mirror, Manfred decided the league-owned MLB Network needed to fire a long-time, credible and respected journalist. Rosenthal confirmed the news via his Twitter account. He also indicated that he is still employed by Fox Sports and will continue to report on the sport for that network.
Can confirm MLB Network has decided not to bring me back. I’m grateful for the more than 12 years I spent there, and my enduring friendships with on-air personalities, producers and staff. I always strove to maintain my journalistic integrity, and my work reflects that. 1/2
— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) January 4, 2022
Commissioners of the “Big 4 Sports Leagues” are supposed to have thick skin. Criticism, skepticism, and whatever other ism’s you can think of, come with the job. Generally speaking, these commissioners make big bucks and in the eyes of fans, never have their collective backs.
Nobody said these jobs were supposed to be easy. You aren’t going to please everyone, but why make matters worse?
Rosenthal was relieved of his ‘insider’ duties at MLB Network Monday. It was revealed by the New York Post that Rosenthal’s article posted to the The Athletic led to a double secret probation of a few months and ultimately his termination. The article, posted June 16, 2020, was critical of Manfred and his handling of the start of the pandemic plagued 2020 baseball season. On the surface, the so-called attack was mild in nature and was filled with truths. Manfred waffled back and forth about the length of a season and then having no season. It led Rosenthal to lines like these from his posted column.
- “As if the perception that Manfred is beholden to owners and out of touch with players was not bad enough, he was trending on Twitter on Monday after performing a massive flip-flop.”
- “Granted, the commissioner is forever in a tricky spot, empowered to act in the best interests of the game, but employed by the owners. Still, how does Manfred in a span of five days go from telling ESPN the season “unequivocally” would take place to saying on the same network he was “not confident” it would happen?”
- “Yet for a guy who suddenly is looking for peace, Manfred sure has a funny way of showing it.”
- “He and the owners, supposed stewards of the game, are turning the national pastime into a national punch line, effectively threatening to take their ball and go home while the country struggles with medical, economic and societal concerns.”
- “If he blows this, it will define him. That should be enough incentive for him to strike a deal, period.”
I guess the truth hurts. Especially the last line. Was the commentary out of line? Nope. Was the commentary a personal attack on the man? Nope.
MLB Network wasn’t set up to be “state run” television. Yes, you have to be careful not to cross that invisible line in the sand. To me, the comments written by Rosenthal don’t really cross any lines. I don’t have inside knowledge about how the other league-operated networks do their business, but they’ve never been in the headlines for something like this.
I’ve written before about the precarious situation some play-by-play and color analysts are in when they are working for the team they’re calling games for. That’s an entirely different situation than this one. Broadcasters who are on the air every day understand going in that being overly critical could have repercussions. At the same time, there is an issue of credibility. If a team is bad and the announcers are talking about how great things are, well that’s a recipe for disaster. The fans will call you a shill and really call into question a lot of things that you’ll say. We as broadcasters need the support of the stations and teams we work for, to be able to call into question things that need to be questioned.
In this case Rosenthal, who is about as respected a journalist as there is in the sport of baseball, was suspended and fired for telling the truth. The commissioner, who represents the owners and ultimately the ownership of the network, couldn’t handle it and flew off the handle instead.
It’s sad really, because Manfred is doing the viewers of the network a major disservice. Rosenthal is one of the kings of breaking news in my mind. I often can’t wait to hear his reports because they are filled with valuable information. This information isn’t opinion, its fact based as it’s gathered from credible sources and delivered by an equally credible source.
The game of baseball is in enough trouble already. It has an image problem. Manfred has an image problem. Things that seem petty like this unwarranted dismissal play right into that narrative. Why would you try to make things worse with something like this? It’s not like Rosenthal is one of those people that continually stirs up controversy. He is above that. His reporting is not sensationalist.

Manfred’s job is not an easy one, I’ll give him that. He has to deal with the egos of some owners that don’t want to give an inch. As the lockout continues, without an ending in sight, the chasm between the fans and baseball continues to widen. I would never tell the man how to do his job, but I will say, if you alienate the fans enough, your sport is finished.

Andy Masur is a columnist for BSM and works for WGN Radio as an anchor and play-by-play announcer. He also teaches broadcasting at the Illinois Media School. During his career he has called games for the Chicago Cubs, San Diego Padres and Chicago White Sox. He can be found on Twitter @Andy_Masur1 or you can reach him by email at Andy@Andy-Masur.com.
Sports Radio News
Chase McCabe Named Director of Operations & Sports Programming at Cromwell
“Our owner, Bud Walters, opened the door for me almost 12 years ago as an intern and I’m honored to continue to be a key member of the Nashville leadership team.”

Published
12 hours agoon
June 2, 2023By
BSM Staff
Congratulations are in order for Chase McCabe. He is adding a new title to his already full plate at Cromwell Media in Nashville. He has been promoted to Director of Operations & Sports Programming at the company.
“I’m very fortunate to have been to be able to grow into this opportunity under one roof,” McCabe said in a press release. “Our owner, Bud Walters, opened the door for me almost 12 years ago as an intern and I’m honored to continue to be a key member of the Nashville leadership team. I am forever grateful, but none of this could have happened without the great group of people we have here at Cromwell Media.”
McCabe has spent his whole career with 102.5 The Game and its sister station, now called 94.9 The Fan. He was named Program Director and Brand Manager of the stations in January of last year. He has maintained an on-air presence as well. He hosts Chase & Michelle weekdays at 9 AM on The Game.
In his new role, Chase McCabe becomes the number two man in Cromwell’s Nashville building. Shawn Fort was recently named the cluster’s general manager.
“Chase and I have developed a great working relationship in the two and half years since I’ve joined Cromwell Media,” Fort said. “We share similar visions on how to create compelling sports programming all while driving revenue growth. I’m excited to have Chase as my right-hand man as we move forward together with this new chapter of leadership at Cromwell Media Nashville.”
Sports Radio News
Mark Schlereth: People Outside of Denver Aren’t Paying Attention to NBA Finals
“There was not one group of people – they’re all in there together – that was paying attention to the NBA Finals.”

Published
14 hours agoon
June 2, 2023By
BSM Staff
The Denver Nuggets took to the National Basketball Association’s largest stage on Thursday night as they defeated the Miami Heat for the organization’s first-ever NBA Finals victory. Early reports reveal that the game had a 2.21 demographic rating between people ages 18-49, attracting a total of 7.62 million viewers on ABC. The figure is considerably lower than the audience for Game 1 between the Boston Celtics and Golden State Warriors last year – which averaged 11.9 million figures across ABC and ESPN2. Ratings for the alternate NBA in Stephen A’s World broadcast Thursday night on ESPN2 have not yet been released by Nielsen Media Research.
Sports fans in the Denver market have felt as if the play of the Nuggets was largely being neglected by the national media throughout these playoffs. Now that the team is the last one standing in the Western Conference, there is no one else to focus on and their play is beginning to be realized by basketball fans throughout the country. It is a narrative that Denver Sports 104.3 The Fan’s Mark Schlereth and Mike Evans felt was especially obvious by watching the press conferences after the game. The duo was able to deduce as such through the questions posed to Nuggets players and head coach Michael Malone by members of the media cohort.
“The national media – it’s like, ‘Oh, wow. We’re just kind of becoming aware of how these guys play,’ and they keep asking the Nuggets about their unselfishness and how everybody is willing to share the ball,” Evans said. “Nikola Jokić [is] being asked about not taking a lot of shots, and they’re all just kind of shrugging their shoulders like, ‘Yeah, this is who we are. We’ve been doing this for a long time.’
Schlereth was curious to find out the ratings from the game last night because he watched the game from a sports bar in Chicago. He is away from Denver, Colo. to help his son’s family move there for the summer and surmises there were about 50 people in the bar with him. What he noticed was that their interest was fixated elsewhere.
“I’m the only person that was watching the Nuggets,” Schlereth said. “There was not one group of people – they’re all in there together – that was paying attention to the NBA Finals.”
“Their loss,” Evans pithily replied.
Denver ranks 19th on Nielsen Media Research’s metropolitan market size list, but the Nuggets have been a contending team for the last five seasons. Most media analysts expect diminished ratings for the NBA Finals this year because of the lack of a storied franchise, even with the Miami Heat as the team’s opponent.
Sports Radio News
Nielsen Releases List of Markets Where Most People Use AM Radio
“In a recent survey, Nielsen Media Research found that AM radio still reaches over 82.3 million Americans on a monthly basis”

Published
14 hours agoon
June 2, 2023By
BSM Staff
Amid concerns regarding the future of AM radio, Nielsen Media Research has unveiled a list of 141 markets where at least 20% of consumers regularly listen to programming on the medium. The list is reflective of the percentage of monthly total radio listening being funneled to AM as opposed to total radio listening as a whole. The top three markets are all in the Great Lakes region, and Westwood One has found large proportions of these listeners are derived from the upper Midwest.
Buffalo-Niagara Falls leads the list with 56% of its audience tuning into AM radio in a month. It is a figure that makes sense based on the variety of AM stations, including leading news talk outlet WBEN and leading sports outlet WGR. The city of Chicago is ranked second, complete with 670 The Score, WGN and WLS. Nearby Milwaukee, Wis. ranks third on the list, another city with various AM stations such as WTMJ and WISN.
In a recent survey, Nielsen Media Research found that AM radio still reaches over 82.3 million Americans on a monthly basis – a measurement that equates to one-third of AM/FM radio listeners as a whole. Fifty-seven percent of the audience listens to stations in the news and/or talk format, utilizing the public service the outlets provide to learn of breaking news and other concerns.
There is a wide variety in market size represented throughout the list, but a trend of markets with undulating topographies tends to have larger shares of AM listeners because of the challenges the landscape presents to FM signals.
The full list compiled by Nielsen Media Research can be found below:
Metro market rank | Market name | Percentage of radio audience that listens to AM radio |
---|---|---|
59 | Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY | 56% |
3 | Chicago, IL [PPM] | 48% |
43 | Milwaukee-Racine, WI [PPM] | 48% |
245 | Sheboygan, WI | 45% |
253 | Grand Forks, ND-MN | 45% |
241 | Bismarck, ND | 44% |
39 | San Jose, CA [PPM] | 43% |
33 | Cincinnati, OH [PPM] | 42% |
11 | Seattle-Tacoma, WA [PPM] | 42% |
192 | Fargo-Moorhead, ND-MN | 41% |
187 | St. Cloud, MN | 41% |
160 | Lincoln, NE | 40% |
130 | Macon, GA | 40% |
196 | Danbury, CT | 39% |
75 | Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA | 39% |
4 | San Francisco, CA [PPM] | 39% |
137 | Youngstown-Warren, OH | 38% |
244 | Sioux City, IA | 38% |
83 | Boise, ID | 38% |
25 | San Antonio, TX [PPM] | 38% |
7 | Atlanta, GA [PPM] | 38% |
60 | Rochester, NY | 37% |
186 | Columbus, GA | 36% |
65 | Dayton, OH | 36% |
176 | Wausau-Stevens Pt (Centrl WI), WI | 36% |
114 | Johnson City-Kingspt-Brstl, TN-VA | 36% |
62 | Tucson, AZ | 36% |
159 | Rockford, IL | 36% |
55 | Louisville, KY | 36% |
27 | Salt Lake City-Ogden-Provo [PPM] | 36% |
202 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 35% |
34 | Kansas City, KS-MO [PPM] | 35% |
70 | Albuquerque, NM | 35% |
88 | Spokane, WA | 35% |
16 | Puerto Rico | 35% |
67 | Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY | 34% |
124 | Morristown, NJ | 34% |
204 | Duluth-Superior, MN-WI | 34% |
71 | Des Moines, IA | 34% |
53 | Richmond, VA | 33% |
145 | Eugene-Springfield, OR | 33% |
252 | Jackson, TN | 33% |
149 | Shreveport, LA | 33% |
52 | Monmouth-Ocean, NJ | 33% |
73 | Metro Fairfield County, CT | 33% |
231 | Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA | 32% |
13 | Phoenix, AZ [PPM] | 32% |
12 | Miami-Ft Lauderdale-Hollywood [PPM] | 32% |
9 | Philadelphia, PA [PPM] | 32% |
96 | Reno, NV | 32% |
28 | Sacramento, CA [PPM] | 32% |
209 | Rochester, MN | 32% |
15 | Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN [PPM] | 31% |
178 | Anchorage, AK | 31% |
199 | Salina-Manhattan, KS | 31% |
2 | Los Angeles, CA [PPM] | 31% |
89 | Madison, WI | 31% |
5 | Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX [PPM] | 31% |
68 | Grand Rapids, MI | 31% |
223 | Eau Claire, WI | 30% |
74 | Allentown-Bethlehem, PA | 30% |
86 | Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle, PA | 30% |
20 | Nassau-Suffolk (Long Island) [PPM] | 30% |
249 | Brunswick, GA | 30% |
139 | Appleton-Oshkosh, WI | 29% |
14 | Detroit, MI [PPM] | 29% |
239 | Harrisonburg, VA | 29% |
30 | Orlando, FL [PPM] | 29% |
10 | Boston, MA [PPM] | 29% |
189 | Bryan-College Station, TX | 29% |
106 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 28% |
154 | Montgomery, AL | 28% |
136 | Reading, PA | 28% |
18 | Denver-Boulder, CO [PPM] | 28% |
188 | Kalamazoo, MI | 28% |
41 | Hudson Valley, NY | 28% |
17 | Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater [PPM] | 28% |
228 | Pueblo, CO | 27% |
230 | Monroe, LA | 27% |
116 | Ft. Wayne, IN | 27% |
35 | Cleveland, OH [PPM] | 27% |
22 | Portland, OR [PPM] | 27% |
183 | Green Bay, WI | 27% |
227 | Bloomington, IL | 26% |
190 | Waco, TX | 26% |
6 | Houston-Galveston, TX [PPM] | 26% |
193 | Binghamton, NY | 26% |
201 | Topeka, KS | 26% |
81 | Stockton, CA | 26% |
54 | Hartford-New Britain-Middletown [PPM] | 26% |
200 | Tuscaloosa, AL | 26% |
175 | Sioux Falls, SD | 25% |
100 | Syracuse, NY | 25% |
44 | Providence-Warwick-Pawtucket [PPM] | 25% |
195 | Manchester, NH | 25% |
180 | Lima-Van Wert, OH | 25% |
1 | New York, NY [PPM] | 25% |
119 | Corpus Christi, TX | 25% |
237 | Grand Island-Kearney-Hastngs, NE | 25% |
51 | Memphis, TN [PPM] | 25% |
142 | Canton, OH | 25% |
151 | Ann Arbor, MI | 24% |
90 | Columbia, SC | 24% |
208 | Las Cruces-Deming, NM | 24% |
178 | Traverse City-Petoskey, MI | 24% |
111 | York, PA | 24% |
87 | Colorado Springs, CO | 24% |
218 | Columbia, MO | 24% |
140 | Savannah, GA | 23% |
163 | Evansville, IN | 23% |
121 | Portsmouth-Dover-Rochester, NH | 23% |
247 | Williamsport, PA | 23% |
221 | Joplin, MO | 22% |
197 | Charleston, WV | 22% |
126 | New Haven, CT | 22% |
120 | Modesto, CA | 22% |
234 | Sussex, NJ | 22% |
69 | Sarasota-Bradenton, FL | 22% |
79 | Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA | 22% |
29 | Austin, TX [PPM] | 22% |
24 | St. Louis, MO [PPM] | 22% |
23 | Baltimore, MD [PPM] | 22% |
127 | Jackson, MS | 22% |
77 | Baton Rouge, LA | 21% |
66 | Fresno, CA | 21% |
206 | Chico, CA | 21% |
104 | Huntsville, AL | 21% |
205 | Santa Barbara, CA | 21% |
166 | Poughkeepsie, NY | 21% |
157 | Peoria, IL | 21% |
224 | Muskegon, MI | 20% |
63 | Honolulu, HI | 20% |
50 | New Orleans, LA | 20% |
19 | San Diego, CA [PPM] | 20% |
236 | Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH | 20% |
32 | Las Vegas, NV [PPM] | 20% |
37 | Raleigh-Durham, NC [PPM] | 20% |
115 | Worcester, MA | 20% |
207 | Laurel-Hattiesburg, MS | 20% |
95 | Akron, OH | 20% |
117 | Lancaster, PA | 20% |